Connect
To Top

Why Is Prince Edward An Earl, Not A Duke?

In any Royal commentator’s books, the announcement in 1999 that Prince Edward would be made an Earl and not a Duke on his wedding day gave quite a shock. By tradition, male children of the sovereign receive a Dukedom on their wedding day, therefore making their new wife, the Duchess Of X rather than the slightly more confusing ‘HRH Princess Michael of Kent’ as happened for Prince Michael’s wife.

Prince Edward is the youngest of the Queen’s children, he is automatically ‘HRH The Prince Edward’ by birth and any other titles come affixed to that.

The title of Earl ranks below Duke, below Prince and below Marquess (though Marquess is never used as a Royal title). It is said that Prince Edward chose the title of Earl of Wessex because of its connotations with one of Edward’s favourite films, Shakespeare In Love, in it featured a character with the title of Earl Of Wessex.It could have been worse for Edward and Sophie, he could have been given no title (like the aforementioned Prince and Princess Michael of Kent), making Sophie: ‘Her Royal Highness The Princess Edward’ or in shorter reference, ‘Princess Edward’.

But all this still doesn’t answer why Edward wasn’t made a Duke. Even one of The Queen’s grandchildren was made a Duke [of Cambridge], so why not Prince Edward?

This was, according to official sources, because one day, when Prince Philip dies, Prince Edward will get the title of Duke Of Edinburgh in order to continue the present Duke’s work. Despite this claim and assurance that this will happen, due to succession to titles laws, it won’t be direct and under some circumstances, may not happen!

Ultimately, Prince Philip will have to die in order for Prince Edward to receive the Dukedom Of Edinburgh, but it’s not quite as simple as the succession to the crown, where it passes straight to the next-in-line, in fact – by default, Prince Charles will inherit the title of Duke Of Edinburgh and if he is King at time, the title will merge with the crown. If he is not King, The Queen will be able to reissue the title.

To complicate matters further, if Charles is on the throne, he doesn’t have to issue the title to Edward (nor does Her present Majesty), the Crown is at liberty to do as wished with the title – it could even be given to another member of the Royal Family.

Despite this, we think that they’ll stick to the promise of making Prince Edward Duke of Edinburgh. Plus, this would mean that, by courtesy, Prince Edward’s son, James, would become Earl Of Wessex and instead of being ‘James, Viscount Severn’, would be ‘James, Earl Of Wessex’. – Lady Louise’s title wouldn’t change – Sophie’s title would become ‘HRH The Duchess Of Edinburgh’.

Royal Titles In Great Britain From Highest To Lowest
Male TitleFemale Title
DukeDuchess
PrincePrincess
EarlCountess
ViscountViscountess
BaronBaroness

  • adam

    Prince is higher the Duke.

    • Royal Central

      An aristocratic Duke ranks below Prince but a Royal Duke ranks above!

  • Bisto

    The Dukedom of Edinburgh, and all other Scottish titles, should die out when Scotland becomes independent.

    • matt227

      It would be up to the Scottish Parliament whether to declare a republic, to continue as a constitutional monarchy, and whether to abolish or continue the Scottish peerage.

      The British Royal Family is still descended from medieval kings through the Scottish Stuarts. James I moved from Edinburgh to London, not the other way around, so Elizabeth is very much the Queen of Scotland as much as she is of England and Wales.

      • Bisto

        Don’t disagree with you for one minute, Matt (love your cartoons in The Telegraph, by the way!). But a wastrel like Jedward is unfit to carry such a title. It would be an insult to the people of Scotland. The title should die out with Prince Philip. If it goes to anybody, it should be Harry!

  • Born2BWyld

    So why wouldn’t “Lady Louise” become “HRH Princess Louise of Edinburgh”? Don’t The Duke of York’s daughters hold titles like that?

  • Kiwi

    Prince Michael of Kent is not a royal duke because he is a younger (not older) son of one. His older brother Prince Edward of Kent inherited the title Duke of Kent from their father, who was the son of King George V. It is only the sons of the sovereign who are granted royal dukedoms on marriage – not generally the grandsons, although this was done for Prince William on marriage, because he is in direct line to the throne, and otherwise his children – who are also in direct line – would not have a princely title. As the younger son, Prince Michael simply retained the title he was born with, and his wife became Princess Michael. But to complicate things, Sophie Countess of Wessex actually IS also known as “Princess Edward” – just as the Duchess of Cambridge also counts “Princess William” among her titles, and the Duchess of Cornwall is also “Princess Charles”, and Sara Ferguson was “Princess Andrew”, as well as Duchess of York. Unless they are actually born into the Royal Family, women do not become princesses in their own name – not even the late Princess of Wales, even though she was often mistakenly called ‘Princess Diana”.

  • Dick Hertz

    Duke, Duke, Duke, Duke of Earl…..

More in Other Royals

Royal Central is the web's most popular source for the latest news and information on the British Royal Family and the Monarchies of Europe.

Subscribe via Email

To receive the latest Royal Central posts straight to your email inbox, enter your email address below and press subscribe.

Join 1,392 other subscribers

Copyright © 2016 Royal Central, all rights reserved.